The decision brings us to the level of other European countries where mifepristone is heavily used: it was almost a "necessary act", not only for the situation in Europe but also saw the previous opinion of the technical-scientific.
does not seem to think so il Vaticano, che ormai entra a gamba tesa nella vita politica italiana con una completa faccia di bronzo, senza tema che qualcuno dei nostri uomini politici difenda il "principio supremo" (parole della Consulta) della laicità dello Stato.
Mons. Sgreccia, massimo bioeticista pontificio, si è premurato di ricordare a tutte le donne cattoliche che l'aborto provoca la scomunica; lo stesso ha fatto il suo diretto successore Mons. Rino Fisichella dalle colonne de "L'Osservatore Romano".
"Avvenire" ha accusato alcune componenti del Governo di non aver fatto abbastanza per scongiurare la decisione della AIFA. Si aggiunge alle voci tonanti Sgreccia of Bishop, Bishop Fisichella and the Future of the bishop of San Marino - Montefeltro, Luigi Negri, that mifepristone is a "human pesticide." Meanwhile
50 fascists of Youth Action, in Rome, occupied the premises for a short time in order to protest AIFA squads and violent anti-abortion.
Locally, the chorus of voices is added to skullcaps Assuntina Morresi, a member of the National Bioethics Committee.
The scholar, who is not a doctor, but a university professor of physics, has released the "Eco di Bergamo" of August 1, 2009 interview full of inaccuracies.
Morresi talks with dubious knowledge of the facts (and the national committee on bioethics in part because CL) and spreads frightening numbers about the dangers of the pill without citing sources. He also continues to linger on the risk of bleeding for women who take RU-486, when the Italian trial, conducted in eight hospitals in 1778 women, there was the need for blood transfusion in one case (source: "il manifesto", 8/9/2001). Moreover, as he writes on the same issue of "Il Manifesto" Carlo Flamigni, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Bologna, deaths reported 29 out of an audience of nearly a million users, are due in nearly all cases of a breach of guidelines, which exclude the use of medication women who smoke a lot, who have heart problems or high blood pressure. Find the article here Flamigni . Continuing
, hospitalization for 15 days, relied on by Morresi, has been suspended in France because it was deemed unnecessary in order to ensure greater security (see our previous article ).
regard to general concerns brought on by the professor, "we do not know the damage that may result over time the pill" "If the chemical action can lead to the occurrence of cancer," they are not justified in the sense that apply to any new drug, by definition. Taking risks is part of any introduction of new substances on the market and, one might say, of any change. A precautionary principle understood in an absolute sense leads only to paralysis. The Italian trial did not reveal anything to worry about. The mefipristone has also been used in many countries (USA, UK, France, Spain, Sweden ...) and, so far, does not appear toxic. This, moreover, is the decisive argument against Morresi: If the pill is so dangerous because the most important countries in the world are using it as an alternative to traditional suction?
The interview of "L'Echo" the professor Morresi is a typical example of the attitude of the Catholic clergy in the face of what they consider wrong. Do not be resigned to the fact that someone can think differently from them and they want to prohibit by law the state what they believe is sinful, even if it means distorting the truth and disseminate misleading information, if it is conducive to the cause prohibition.
clerical Catholics show the exact opposite of a mentality liberal, which is the only democratic thinking: in fact challenge the principle that one can forbid only to protect the rights of others.
And if so what right should be protected? The embryo?
But do not even know if the embryo is a person or not, so if you may have rights in general.
But it is certain that a pregnant woman has a body that has authority over it. The body belongs to her and does what he wants: it is a right that it can not be taken away and that is part of the broader right to personal integrity, the same makes unjust injuries and torture. The woman then has the full, irrevocable right to abortion if they wish and also not to do so if they so wish. If a woman could not abort, it would be divested of his body, deprived of itself. Forcing a woman to become pregnant is unacceptable violence, and it is not giving her the right to choose the way in which abortions, if more than one is available. It is hoped that the government does not want to further put a spanner in the exercise of a right of women, for example. requiring long hospitalizations that have already been exceeded in many parts of the world. But after the story Englaro, the atti d'indirizzo, i decreti anti-Cassazione e i parlamenti convocati ad horas, da questo governo ci si può aspettare solo il peggio.
 
Fonte: Tommaso Bruni Coordinatore circolo UAAR BERGAMO
0 comments:
Post a Comment